Florida Pool Prosm | Classifieds


FSPA News

2008 Florida Pool Pro (sm) newsletters   |   Previous FSPA News

FSPA Legislative Update, Week One
FSPA Legislative Update, Week Two and Three
FSPA Legislative Update Supplement (Wk Two/ Three)

FSPA Legislative Update, Week Four
FSPA Legislative Update, Week Six

FSPA Legislative Update, Week Seven
FSPA Preliminary Final Legislative Report


Web advertising is now available!
Information & Rate Sheet
Order Sheet

APSP Suction Entrapment Article - in laymen's terms

 

Florida Is On Top Of Pool Safety


By DAN JOHNSON Special to the Tribune
Originally published in The Tampa Tribune on April 28, 2008

Your editorial "Lawmakers, Crist Must Plug Holes In Pool Safety Requirements" (Our Opinion, April 21) is misguided - dangerously misguided.

It states, "Drowning deaths are a certainty if lawmakers don't intervene." The opposite is actually closer to the truth - if the lawmakers would leave the language in the Uniform Florida Building Code alone, drowning deaths will be averted. New pools built and maintained in accordance with the Florida Building Code will completely eliminate the entrapment hazard.

The editorial states that the Florida Building Commission dropped the requirement for anti-entrapment devices on new pools. They did drop the requirement for new pools, but the anti-entrapment devices you refer to in your editorial are actually included in the language adopted by the FBC at the appropriate place in the code.

These devices and systems protect against swimmers becoming trapped by suction force on a bottom drain. The code includes them for use in the "existing pools, single drain" section, where they are effective, not on pools with dual drains or no drains as allowed by the code for new construction.
I note that you mentioned 150 deaths and injuries from 1990 to 2003. Not mentioned was that not one of those injuries or deaths occurred on a pool that was built and maintained in accordance with code - not one.

Another thing your editorial didn't say was that these devices only protect against body entrapment. The article mentions disembowelment, a tragic event, but fails to mention that these devices and/or systems do nothing to protect against this hazard. Nor do they protect against hair entanglement in drain covers - the leading cause of entrapment.

In fact, they only protect against body entrapment while the code language adopted by the Florida Building Commission protects against all five known hazards.

What the FBC did was adopt the American National Standards Institute ANSI-7 Suction Entrapment Avoidance in Swimming Pools, Wading Pools, Spas, Hot Tubs, and Catch Basins into the Florida Uniform Building Code. This standard is the most heavily researched, scientifically validated swimming pool safety standard ever produced and it addresses all five hazards.

The language in the ANSI-7 Standard is the foundation upon which the "Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act" was constructed by Congress and signed into federal law Dec. 19, 2007.

The single most effective method of protection is having an approved safety cover in place on all drains, but the bill currently before the House does nothing to require safety drain covers on residential pools, nor does it require retrofitting existing single-drain pools, where these devices might have an effect.
Your editorial was not sufficiently researched. It urged application of the right solution to the wrong problem, like mandating seat belts for motorcycles.

Suction entrapment is a serious problem which can be completely eliminated when the right solution is applied, and that solution is the language adopted by the Florida Building Commission. The group spent two years investigating solutions before adopting it. The Legislature would do well to trust them.

Dan Johnson is a member of the Association of Pool & Spa Professionals' technical committee.

 

TELL MEL: Recalling story that may lead to recall
Melanie Payne • tellmel@news-press.com • April 28, 2008

Tell Mel Issues Recall

I wrote an article earlier this month about a girl visiting from Canada who was sucked onto a pool drain at her grandpa's house in North Fort Myers. The accident left her with a nasty bruise as a reminder of how close she came to losing her life.

The column caught the eye of someone at the Consumer Product Safety Commission which brought Allan Krasner, a federal agent and investigator with the agency, to Lee County last week.

Albert Brewer, a North Fort Myers snowbird, had already replaced the drain covers on the pool and spa where his granddaughter had the accident. But he held on to the old covers and Krasner took one with him after interviewing Brewer and inspecting the pool and spa.

Krasner told me that this could be the first step in a product recall - exactly what Brewer demanded after he saw what happened to his granddaughter.

But rather than wait months or years for the government to issue a recall, let's do what Brewer did and take action.

Look at the photo of the drain on Page B2. If the one on the bottom of your pool or spa looks like it, call a pool company and get it replaced with an anti-entrapment drain cover.

Insist the drain covers have an "ASME/ANSI A112.19.8" rating.

The $100 spent on a safe drain cover is worth it to save a life.

 

 

Previous News

PDF iconImmigration Law Enforcement Update
PDF iconApril is Swimming Pool Safety Month
PDF iconProclamation by Governor Charlie Crist
PDF iconWhat do you do for me?
PDF iconHometown Democracy Fails to Qualify for 2008 Ballot
PDF iconDamage to Your Work by Subcontractor Ruling
PDF iconFSPA Joins Coalition to Fight Secondary Metal Theft
PDF iconContributing to PIPAC Chapter contest and silent auction
PDF iconPreventing entrapment tragedies, by Steve Getzoff
PDF icon Summary of the Pool and Spa Safety Act
PDF iconPool and Spa Safety Act Enacted into Law & PDF iconTitle XIV Pool and Spa Safety

Back to Top